$OM’s $6B Meltdown: How Panic and OTC Deals Crashed the Market

OM token selloff
Share with friends:

In one of the most dramatic collapses of this crypto cycle, the $OM token saw over $6 billion in value wiped out in just 30 minutes. What began as a single wallet transaction spiraled into a full-blown market meltdown, exposing the fragility of tokens concentrated in the hands of a few.

The Trigger: A Massive Deposit

A crypto analyst known as @AltCryptoGems on X spotted a chain reaction that began when a wallet linked to @MANTRA_Chain moved 3.9 million $OM tokens to the OKX exchange. For a community already on edge about the project’s transparency, this triggered immediate concern. Traders feared an imminent sell-off—and those fears quickly came true.

Fuel to the Fire: OTC Rumors

Rumors quickly spread of over-the-counter (OTC) deals offering $OM at 50% discounts. As @AltCryptoGems explained, “There were rumors that OM had made private deals with investors, offering tokens at huge discounts — some at 50% off or even more”.

When the market price dropped by half, discounted buyers were suddenly underwater. Panic selling ensued, triggering stop-losses and liquidating leveraged positions. Within an hour, $OM had lost 90% of its value, echoing the speed of collapses like $LUNA in 2022.

Red Flags Ignored

The crash wasn’t entirely unpredictable. Several warning signs had been flashing for months:

  • Concentration of supply: Reports suggested the OM team controlled nearly 90% of the token supply, giving them outsized influence over price movements.
  • Opaque practices: Allegations of using market makers to artificially stabilize prices.
  • Broken promises: Delays in delivering a long-promised community airdrop.
  • Shifting tokenomics: Quiet changes to the project’s economic model without clear communication.

These issues eroded trust, leaving the market primed for panic once the deposit hit.

Lessons for Investors

The $OM collapse underscores critical lessons for traders and investors:

  • Beware of concentrated supply: Tokens dominated by a small group are inherently risky.
  • Demand transparency: Hidden deals and delayed promises often signal deeper problems.
  • Don’t ignore stability red flags: If a token’s price seems “too stable,” it may be artificially supported.
  • Do your research: Community sentiment and tokenomics matter as much as hype.

The $OM crash has already been compared to $LUNA’s implosion in 2022, serving as a reminder that history often repeats itself in crypto. While innovation continues to drive the industry forward, the risks of opaque governance and concentrated control remain ever-present.

Share with friends:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Enable Notifications OK No thanks